I’d like to keep my $1 a day, thanks

Posted by – 1 May, 2013

A quick reality check regarding current Commonwealth and State disability support, care of the taxpayer:

Government Disability payments for 2012-13 $bn
Disability Support Payments 14.8
Income support for carers 6.3
Disability employment services 1.0
Services and support for people with a disability 0.3
Other 0.3
Sub – Total, Commonwealth 22.7
Disability services – New South Wales 2.5
Disability services – Victoria 1.5
Disability services – Queensland 1.4
Disability services – South Australia 0.7
Disability services – Western Australia 0.6
Disability services – Tasmania 0.2
Disability services – Territories 0.2
Sub – Total, State and Territories 6.9
Grand Total 29.6

So some quick math: $29.6 billion divided by 400,000 severely disabled clients = $74,000 per person per year. Do we really need to force tax payers to come up with another $3.2 billion  for Gillard’s new disability scheme, via a rise in the medicare levy, with total costs rising to $8 $15 $22 billion a year and likely growing at 5 7 per cent a year ad infinitum?

Seems on the face of it that there is already a huge amount of resources being devoted to disability care. So there should be sufficient scope to better utilise current resources, thereby avoiding the lazy option of a new tax.

The ones we know about

Posted by – 24 April, 2013

Sounds unsafe

SECRECY surrounds three asylum seekers illegal immigrants who recently arrived in Australia after being separately accused of terrorism, murder and drug trafficking.

Fixed.

UPDATE

Article 1
definition of the term “refugee”

F. The provisions of this Convention shall not apply to any person with
respect to whom there are serious reasons for considering that:
(a) he has committed a crime against peace, a war crime, or a crime against
humanity, as defined in the international instruments drawn up to
make provision in respect of such crimes;
(b) he has committed a serious non-political crime outside the country of
refuge prior to his admission to that country as a refugee;
(c) he has been guilty of acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the
United Nations.

Further,

Article 31
1. The Contracting States shall not impose penalties, on account of their
illegal entry or presence, on refugees who, coming directly from a territory
where their life or freedom was threatened in the sense of article 1, enter or
are present in their territory without authorization, provided they present
themselves without delay to the authorities and show good cause for their
illegal entry or presence.

Gillard and jail

Posted by – 23 April, 2013

Why would anyone vote for Gillard when in all likelihood she will face legal proceedings and possible jail time in the next three years for her role in the AWU scandal?

It has now been confirmed by Ben Fordham that Gillard is under Police investigation for her role in the scandal.

UPDATE

In case you are in any doubt about what a complete fool Gillard is then listen here. The Victorian Police have confirmed that an investigation into the AWU scandal is well underway.

A prudent public announcement

Posted by – 19 April, 2013

Get ready for a Labo(u)r light Tony Abbott as PM

Posted by – 18 April, 2013

The more Abbott talks closer to the election the more Abbott seems like David Cameron in the UK. As opposition leader Abbott has been a little too quick to try and please the ABC set.

Yesterday shadow assistant treasurer Matthias Cormann cast doubt on the scheme, telling a mining forum in Brisbane that the Coalition had not finalised its funding plan.

But, as the Coalition begins the roll-out of its policies ahead of the September 14 election, Mr Abbott has confirmed that the previous policy stands.

The Coalition scheme would be funded by 1.5 per cent levy on companies with taxable incomes of more than $5 million. That would be offset by a 1.5 per cent cut in the company tax rate.

“That’s our policy,” Mr Abbott said today

Well, it’s Tony Abbott’s policy. I don’t think there is much support for it in Coalition ranks. Add Green Army, ‘renewable’ energy targets, etc…get the picture?

26,000 views and counting

Posted by – 16 April, 2013

Not a conspiracy, just incompetence

Posted by – 15 April, 2013

Horner defends himself against his conspiracy critics.

Horner, though, is adamant that despite Webber’s numerous problems, which came on the back of the team’s Malaysian controversy, there is no conspiracy against the 36-year-old.

“It’s complete rubbish, forget conspiracy,” said the Red Bull Racing team boss.

“We’re all about trying to get two cars to the finish as high as we can.

“Anybody who thinks there is a conspiracy here against either driver does not know what they are looking at.”

Fine then, but it is obvious that both Red Bull cars are not the same and at times RBR has been actively working to ensure that Vettel finishes ahead of Webber, such as using pit undercuts.

Cory Bernardi

Posted by – 14 April, 2013

One for the shame file:

Articles published by Fairfax Media on January 27 and 28 contained allegations that Senator Cory Bernardi had failed to properly declare pecuniary and other interests in his statement of registrable interests.

They alleged that Senator Bernardi had breached his disclosure obligations by not declaring his role as international delegate of the American Legislative Exchange Council or payments received from the Heartland Institute for travel and accommodation.

Fairfax Media accepts that its reporting of those matters was factually inaccurate in a number of respects and that the allegations regarding Senator Bernardi were unfounded.

We retract those allegations and apologise to Senator Bernardi for the distress and damage caused by the articles.

Wonder what happened to the reporter.

What did you expect?

Posted by – 13 April, 2013

After running faster than Vettel in Q1 of the Chinese GP, Webber had fuel issues in Q2 which forced him to pull over. The exact issue is still unclear. Either no fuel or lack of fuel pressure. Last season Webber had mechanical issues in the first three races, this time in 2013 is running 2 out of 3 for issues.

Conspiracy? What is clear is that both Red Bull cars are not the same. Although I can just imagine Marko going epiplectic at the thought of Webber out qualifying Vettel.

UPDATE

The 36-year-old only had 150ml fuel left in his tank and Red Bull said “a fuel bowser problem caused an incorrect fuel measurement to be delivered to Mark’s car”.

Kermit Gosnell

Posted by – 13 April, 2013

This is story from the US about infanticide and all that entails is without doubt the most horrific story in the developed world right now, but apart from Fox News and a few online websites the US  media for the most part won’t cover it.

For this isn’t solely a story about babies having their heads severed, though it is that. It is also a story about a place where, according to the grand jury, women were sent to give birth into toilets; where a doctor casually spread gonorrhea and chlamydiae to unsuspecting women through the reuse of cheap, disposable instruments; an office where a 15-year-old administered anesthesia; an office where former workers admit to playing games when giving patients powerful narcotics; an office where white women were attended to by a doctor and black women were pawned off on clueless untrained staffers. Any single one of those things would itself make for a blockbuster news story. Is it even conceivable that an optometrist who attended to his white patients in a clean office while an intern took care of the black patients in a filthy room wouldn’t make national headlines?

But it isn’t even solely a story of a rogue clinic that’s awful in all sorts of sensational ways either. Multiple local and state agencies are implicated in an oversight failure that is epic in proportions! If I were a city editor for any Philadelphia newspaper the grand jury report would suggest a dozen major investigative projects I could undertake if I had the staff to support them. And I probably wouldn’t have the staff. But there is so much fodder for additional reporting.

There is, finally, the fact that abortion, one of the most hotly contested, polarizing debates in the country, is at the center of this case. It arguably informs the abortion debate in any number of ways, and has numerous plausible implications for abortion policy, including the oversight and regulation of clinics, the appropriateness of late-term abortions, the penalties for failing to report abuses, the statute of limitations for killings like those with which Gosnell is charged, whether staff should be legally culpable for the bad behavior of doctors under whom they work…

There’s just no end to it.

Don’t think for one moment this could never happen in Australia.